Q Using your own information and the course content: Organize, develop, and write a Draft Literature Review. Submit the Draft Literature Review as an assignment for grading and feedback. Length requirement for the rough draft - 6-8 pages of content. The title page, the table of contents, the reference page, and appendices are not considered content. Good to consider that the more you submit, the more feedback I can provide. Do not forget to review the rubric as this is what I use to evaluate the assignment. Please remember that in the final submission for the rough draft, the page minimum is 10 pages and the maximum is 12 pages ( stop reading after 12 pages). The importance of editing and keeping focused cannot be understated. In the final submission, you should strive for 7-10 references. I have attached a literature review template t Download literature review template that you may want to consider using. If you do not know how to use the style guide, please contact me. I have also included a short example (not a lot of detail related to content) of a literature review. Please note the headings. Download Please note the headings. To upload your completed work, click on the Submit Assignment button. Rubric Draft Literature Review Rubric Draft Literature Review Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroducing the idea: Problem Statement 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the article. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge or topic of the article. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the article. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody: Flow of the review 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points The summary goes from general ideas to specific conclusions. Transitions tie sections together as well as adjacent paragraphs. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections or paragraphs follow in a natural or logical order. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points The summary appears to have no direction with subtopics appearing disjointed. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoverage of content 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit as expected. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points Major sections of pertinent content have been omitted or greatly run-on. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing and writing techniques 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. The writer incorporate the active voice when appropriate and supports ideas with examples. No spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are made. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points Writing is generally clear, but unnecessary words are occasionally used. Meaning is sometimes hidden. Paragraph or sentence structure is too repetitive. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Writing is convoluted. Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, and improper punctuation are evident. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion: A synthesis of ideas 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points The author was able to make succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. Insights into the problem are appropriate. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points The author provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the body of the report. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points There is no indication the author tried to synthesize the information or make a conclusion based on the literature under review. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations/References: Proper APA format 25 pts Accomplished; 25-20 points Citations did follow APA format. Essential information was accurate and complete. 19 pts Proficient; 19-15 points Citations did follow APA format; however a few errors in the essential APA format were evident. 14 pts Developing: 14-0 points Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the article. 25 pts Total Points: 150 PreviousNext